↓ Skip to main content

Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Treating Recurrent Non-infectious Uveitis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Fluocinolone Acetonide Intravitreal Implant for Treating Recurrent Non-infectious Uveitis: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40273-019-00851-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xavier G. L. V. Pouwels, Svenja Petersohn, Vanesa Huertas Carrera, Alastair K. Denniston, Annette Chalker, Heike Raatz, Nigel Armstrong, Dhwani Shah, Willem Witlox, Gill Worthy, Caro Noake, Rob Riemsma, Jos Kleijnen, Manuela A. Joore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 34%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,697,497
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#1,661
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,370
of 365,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.