↓ Skip to main content

Temperature log simulations in high-enthalpy boreholes

Overview of attention for article published in Geothermal Energy, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Temperature log simulations in high-enthalpy boreholes
Published in
Geothermal Energy, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40517-019-0149-0
Authors

Jia Wang, Fabian Nitschke, Maziar Gholami Korzani, Thomas Kohl

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Other 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Professor 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 30%
Engineering 4 20%
Psychology 1 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Energy 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,036,345
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Geothermal Energy
#84
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,923
of 366,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geothermal Energy
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.