↓ Skip to main content

Practical Considerations for the Use of Daratumumab, a Novel CD38 Monoclonal Antibody, in Myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Practical Considerations for the Use of Daratumumab, a Novel CD38 Monoclonal Antibody, in Myeloma
Published in
Drugs, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40265-016-0573-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Moreau, Niels W. C. J. van de Donk, Jesus San Miguel, Henk Lokhorst, Hareth Nahi, Dina Ben-Yehuda, Michele Cavo, Gordon Cook, Michel Delforge, Hermann Einsele, Sonja Zweegman, Heinz Ludwig, Christoph Driessen, Antonio Palumbo, Thierry Facon, Torben Plesner, Meletios Dimopoulos, Pia Sondergeld, Pieter Sonneveld, María-Victoria Mateos

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are a recent addition to multiple myeloma (MM) therapies and a number of mAbs directed at myeloma cell surface molecules are in development. Daratumumab is a CD38 mAb that has demonstrated substantial activity and good tolerability in four phase I, phase I/II and phase II studies as monotherapy, as well as in combination with current standard treatments in MM. The positive results obtained in the relapsed/refractory setting in patients with advanced-stage disease and in a small number of patients with newly diagnosed disease provide the rationale for the investigation of the agent in a number of ongoing phase III trials. mAbs are generally better tolerated than conventional chemotherapy; however, their use requires other special considerations. Such factors include those common to all mAbs, namely infusion-related reactions, but also factors that are observed with mAbs used in myeloma, such as interference with response assessment, or factors that are related to CD38 mAbs such as daratumumab, for instance blood typing interference. Our review provides an overview of the results from the daratumumab clinical trials conducted to date, as well as practical management considerations for the use of daratumumab based on our experience with the agent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 26%
Other 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 10 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,146,516
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#619
of 3,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,432
of 308,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.