↓ Skip to main content

Vaccinomics for the Major Blood Feeding Helminths of Humans

Overview of attention for article published in OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vaccinomics for the Major Blood Feeding Helminths of Humans
Published in
OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology, June 2011
DOI 10.1089/omi.2010.0150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Loukas, Soraya Gaze, Jason P. Mulvenna, Robin B. Gasser, Paul J. Brindley, Denise L. Doolan, Jeffrey M. Bethony, Malcolm K. Jones, Geoffrey N. Gobert, Patrick Driguez, Donald P. McManus, Peter J. Hotez

Abstract

Approximately one billion people are infected with hookworms and/or blood flukes (schistosomes) in developing countries. These two parasites are responsible for more disability adjusted life years lost than most other neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), and together, are second only to malaria. Although anthelmintic drugs are effective and widely available, they do not protect against reinfection, resistant parasites are likely to emerge, and mass drug administration programs are unsustainable. Therefore, there is a pressing need for the development of vaccines against these parasites. In recent years, there have been major advances in our understanding of hookworms and schistosomes at the molecular level through the use of "omics" technologies. The secretomes of these parasites have been characterized using transcriptomics, genomics, proteomics, and newly developed gene manipulation and silencing techniques, and the proteins of interest are now the target of novel antigen discovery approaches, notably immunomics. This research has resulted in the discovery, development, and early stage clinical trials of subunit vaccines against hookworms and schistosomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Australia 2 3%
Switzerland 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Pakistan 1 1%
Unknown 61 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 28%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Professor 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2012.
All research outputs
#20,930,935
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#552
of 708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,932
of 117,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.