| Title |
Continuity and changes in plant resources during the Neolithic period in western Switzerland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003340200018 |
| Authors |
Sabine Karg, Tanja Märkle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,113,074
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#58
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,288
of 228,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.