You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is Automated Journalistic Writing Less Biased? An Experimental Test of Auto-Written and Human-Written News Stories
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journalism Practice, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2019.1682940 |
| Authors |
Yanfang Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 361 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 61 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 17 | 5% |
| Canada | 8 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| France | 6 | 2% |
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 4 | 1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Singapore | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Unknown | 220 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 330 | 91% |
| Scientists | 18 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Researcher | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 24% |
| Psychology | 6 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 275. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#132,373
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Practice
#3
of 1,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,607
of 378,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Practice
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.