| Title |
Critical Appraisal of the Impact of Oesophageal Stents in the Management of Oesophageal Anastomotic Leaks and Benign Oesophageal Perforations: An Updated Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-019-05259-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sivesh K. Kamarajah, James Bundred, Gary Spence, Andrew Kennedy, Bobby V. M. Dasari, Ewen A. Griffiths |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 17% |
| United States | 5 | 17% |
| Spain | 2 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 38% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2021.
All research outputs
#2,028,004
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#244
of 4,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,702
of 370,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#4
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.