| Title |
Comparing the effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation via sexual cognitive/behavioral therapy of pelvic floor muscles versus local injection of botulinum toxin on the sexual functioning of patients with primary vaginismus: a randomized clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00192-018-3836-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mansooreh Yaraghi, Shirin Ghazizadeh, Fariba Mohammadi, Elahe Miri Ashtiani, Mahmood Bakhtiyari, Sayeda Mahjabeen Mareshi, Fatemeh Sadat Sarfjoo, Tahereh Eftekhar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 171 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 78 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 85 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#1,971
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#281,327
of 445,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#31
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.