| Title |
A low-cost aeroponic phenotyping system for storage root development: unravelling the below-ground secrets of cassava (Manihot esculenta)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-019-0517-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Gomez Selvaraj, Maria Elker Montoya-P, John Atanbori, Andrew P. French, Tony Pridmore |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 13% |
| Colombia | 5 | 8% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Burundi | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 80% |
| Scientists | 10 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 31% |
| Engineering | 8 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2022.
All research outputs
#451,889
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#7
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,043
of 381,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.