Title |
Risk of uterine rupture in women undergoing trial of labour with a history of both a caesarean section and a vaginal delivery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00404-011-2048-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hinke de Lau, Hendrik Gremmels, Nico W. Schuitemaker, Anneke Kwee |
Abstract |
To determine the risk of uterine rupture for women undergoing trial of labour (TOL) with both a prior caesarean section (CS) and a vaginal delivery. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 32% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 79% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2011.
All research outputs
#21,164,509
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1,537
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,687
of 126,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#17
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.