| Title |
Did the ban on serving raw beef liver in restaurants decrease Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection in Japan?: an interrupted time-series analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12879-019-4576-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kentaro Iwata, Michihiko Goto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,153 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 390 | 34% |
| Korea, Republic of | 6 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| China | 3 | <1% |
| Austria | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 1% |
| Unknown | 727 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1140 | 99% |
| Scientists | 6 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | <1% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 260. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#143,476
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#45
of 8,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,930
of 383,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.