| Title |
Factors regulating the coastal nutrient filter in the Baltic Sea
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-019-01282-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jacob Carstensen, Daniel J. Conley, Elin Almroth-Rosell, Eero Asmala, Erik Bonsdorff, Vivi Fleming-Lehtinen, Bo G. Gustafsson, Camilla Gustafsson, Anna-Stiina Heiskanen, Urzsula Janas, Alf Norkko, Caroline Slomp, Anna Villnäs, Maren Voss, Mindaugas Zilius |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 6 | 22% |
| Sweden | 5 | 19% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 59% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#2,189,929
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#398
of 1,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,029
of 383,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#15
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,954 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.