↓ Skip to main content

Forensic and phylogeographic characterisation of mtDNA lineages from Somalia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Forensic and phylogeographic characterisation of mtDNA lineages from Somalia
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00414-012-0694-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Mikkelsen, Liane Fendt, Alexander W. Röck, Bettina Zimmermann, Eszter Rockenbauer, Anders J. Hansen, Walther Parson, Niels Morling

Abstract

The African mitochondrial (mt) phylogeny is coarsely resolved but the majority of population data generated so far is limited to the analysis of the first hypervariable segment (HVS-1) of the control region (CR). Therefore, this study aimed on the investigation of the entire CR of 190 unrelated Somali individuals to enrich the severely underrepresented African mtDNA pool. The majority (60.5 %) of the haplotypes were of sub-Saharan origin with L0a1d, L2a1h and L3f being the most frequently observed haplogroups. This is in sharp contrast to previous data reported from the Y-chromosome, where only about 5 % of the observed haplogroups were of sub-Saharan provenance. We compared the genetic distances based on population pairwise F (st) values between 11 published East, Central and North African as well as western Asian populations and the Somali sequences and displayed them in a multi-dimensional scaling plot. Genetic proximity evidenced by clustering roughly reflected the relative geographic location of the populations. The sequences will be included in the EMPOP database ( www.empop.org ) under accession number EMP00397 upon publication (Parson and Dür Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:88-92, 2007).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 21%
Social Sciences 4 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,913,197
of 24,378,020 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#185
of 2,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,699
of 164,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.