↓ Skip to main content

Theoretical and Experimental Sets of Choice Anode/Cathode Architectonics for High-Performance Full-Scale LIB Built-up Models

Overview of attention for article published in Nano-Micro Letters, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Theoretical and Experimental Sets of Choice Anode/Cathode Architectonics for High-Performance Full-Scale LIB Built-up Models
Published in
Nano-Micro Letters, October 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40820-019-0315-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. Khalifa, S. A. El-Safty, A. Reda, M. A. Shenashen, M. M. Selim, A. Elmarakbi, H. A. Metawa

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 5 19%
Engineering 3 11%
Chemistry 3 11%
Energy 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2019.
All research outputs
#20,587,621
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Nano-Micro Letters
#912
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,559
of 352,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nano-Micro Letters
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.