↓ Skip to main content

Decreased snowpack and warmer temperatures reduce the negative effects of interspecific competitors on regenerating conifers

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Decreased snowpack and warmer temperatures reduce the negative effects of interspecific competitors on regenerating conifers
Published in
Oecologia, November 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00442-019-04536-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chhaya M. Werner, Derek J. N. Young, Hugh D. Safford, Truman P. Young

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Master 9 18%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,217,622
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#344
of 4,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,038
of 365,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#6
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.