↓ Skip to main content

Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
541 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conducting in-depth interviews with and without voice recorders: a comparative analysis
Published in
Qualitative Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/1468794119884806
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rwamahe Rutakumwa, Joseph Okello Mugisha, Sarah Bernays, Elizabeth Kabunga, Grace Tumwekwase, Martin Mbonye, Janet Seeley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 541 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 541 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 13%
Student > Master 68 13%
Researcher 34 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 6%
Student > Bachelor 32 6%
Other 96 18%
Unknown 210 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 81 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 66 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 5%
Arts and Humanities 26 5%
Psychology 21 4%
Other 96 18%
Unknown 223 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,417,723
of 25,385,864 outputs
Outputs from Qualitative Research
#100
of 711 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,950
of 374,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Qualitative Research
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 711 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.