| Title |
A systematic scoping review of ethical issues in mentoring in internal medicine, family medicine and academic medicine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Health Sciences Education, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10459-019-09934-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clarissa Wei Shuen Cheong, Elisha Wan Ying Chia, Kuang Teck Tay, Wen Jie Chua, Fion Qian Hui Lee, Eugene Yong Hian Koh, Annelissa Mien Chew Chin, Ying Pin Toh, Stephen Mason, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#15,058,508
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#649
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,774
of 364,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.