You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Should Care Managers for Older Adults Be Located in Primary Care? A Randomized Controlled Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03763.x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Parsons, Hugh Senior, Ngaire Kerse, Mei‐hua Chen, Stephen Jacobs, Stephen Vanderhoorn, Craig Anderson |
| Abstract |
To determine the effect of a primary care-based care management initiative on residential care placement and death in a population of frail older adults referred for needs assessment in New Zealand. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 16% |
| Psychology | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,686,422
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#2,463
of 8,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,462
of 254,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
#13
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.