↓ Skip to main content

Merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when developing electronic health records with embedded clinical decision support systems in Palestinian hospitals: a consensus study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
Title
Merits, features, and desiderata to be considered when developing electronic health records with embedded clinical decision support systems in Palestinian hospitals: a consensus study
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12911-019-0928-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramzi Shawahna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 94 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Researcher 5 5%
Lecturer 4 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 40 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 13%
Computer Science 6 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 44 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2019.
All research outputs
#18,697,497
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,592
of 2,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,370
of 365,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#47
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.