| Title |
Evaluation of the efficacy of aquaculture feeds for the climbing perch Anabas testudineus: replacement of fishmeal by black soldier fly Hermetia illucens prepupae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fisheries Science, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12562-019-01381-5 |
| Authors |
Bounsong Vongvichith, Shinsuke Morioka, Tsuyoshi Sugita, Nokjalia Phousavanh, Norkeo Phetsanghanh, Phonaphet Chanthasone, Phoutsamone Pommachan, Satoshi Nakamura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 16% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,706,694
of 23,543,207 outputs
Outputs from Fisheries Science
#22
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,457
of 361,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fisheries Science
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,543,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,483 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.