| Title |
A new combination rule for Spatial Decision Support Systems for epidemiology
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Health Geographics, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12942-019-0187-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciana Moura Mendes de Lima, Laísa Ribeiro de Sá, Ana Flávia Uzeda dos Santos Macambira, Jordana de Almeida Nogueira, Rodrigo Pinheiro de Toledo Vianna, Ronei Marcos de Moraes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,969,891
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#401
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,243
of 368,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.