↓ Skip to main content

Book Review: Brigitte Nerlich, Sarah Hartley, Sujatha Raman and Alexander Smith (eds), Science and the Politics of Openness – Here Be Monsters

Overview of attention for article published in Public Understanding of Science, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Book Review: Brigitte Nerlich, Sarah Hartley, Sujatha Raman and Alexander Smith (eds), Science and the Politics of Openness – Here Be Monsters
Published in
Public Understanding of Science, November 2019
DOI 10.1177/0963662519887309
Authors

Sarah R Davies

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#14,272,089
of 24,157,645 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#791
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,265
of 370,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,157,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.