↓ Skip to main content

DisProt: intrinsic protein disorder annotation in 2020

Overview of attention for article published in Nucleic Acids Research, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
210 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
171 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DisProt: intrinsic protein disorder annotation in 2020
Published in
Nucleic Acids Research, November 2019
DOI 10.1093/nar/gkz975
Pubmed ID
Authors

András Hatos, Borbála Hajdu-Soltész, Alexander M Monzon, Nicolas Palopoli, Lucía Álvarez, Burcu Aykac-Fas, Claudio Bassot, Guillermo I Benítez, Martina Bevilacqua, Anastasia Chasapi, Lucia Chemes, Norman E Davey, Radoslav Davidović, A Keith Dunker, Arne Elofsson, Julien Gobeill, Nicolás S González Foutel, Govindarajan Sudha, Mainak Guharoy, Tamas Horvath, Valentin Iglesias, Andrey V Kajava, Orsolya P Kovacs, John Lamb, Matteo Lambrughi, Tamas Lazar, Jeremy Y Leclercq, Emanuela Leonardi, Sandra Macedo-Ribeiro, Mauricio Macossay-Castillo, Emiliano Maiani, José A Manso, Cristina Marino-Buslje, Elizabeth Martínez-Pérez, Bálint Mészáros, Ivan Mičetić, Giovanni Minervini, Nikoletta Murvai, Marco Necci, Christos A Ouzounis, Mátyás Pajkos, Lisanna Paladin, Rita Pancsa, Elena Papaleo, Gustavo Parisi, Emilie Pasche, Pedro J Barbosa Pereira, Vasilis J Promponas, Jordi Pujols, Federica Quaglia, Patrick Ruch, Marco Salvatore, Eva Schad, Beata Szabo, Tamás Szaniszló, Stella Tamana, Agnes Tantos, Nevena Veljkovic, Salvador Ventura, Wim Vranken, Zsuzsanna Dosztányi, Peter Tompa, Silvio C E Tosatto, Damiano Piovesan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 171 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 171 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Master 11 6%
Professor 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 50 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 9%
Computer Science 9 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 15 9%
Unknown 56 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,710,379
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Nucleic Acids Research
#1,412
of 27,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,394
of 374,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nucleic Acids Research
#39
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.