| Title |
Comparison of N2O emissions from soils at three temperate agricultural sites: simulations of year-round measurements by four models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, October 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1009780109748 |
| Authors |
S.E. Frolking, A.R. Mosier, D.S. Ojima, C. Li, W.J. Parton, C.S. Potter, E. Priesack, R. Stenger, C. Haberbosch, P. Dörsch, H. Flessa, K.A. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2011.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#77
of 563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,823
of 32,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 563 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 32,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.