↓ Skip to main content

The Political Functions of (Premodern) Courts and Procedure and Questions of Comparative Method

Overview of attention for article published in Law & History Review, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Political Functions of (Premodern) Courts and Procedure and Questions of Comparative Method
Published in
Law & History Review, November 2019
DOI 10.1017/s0738248019000464
Authors

Amalia D. Kessler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Law & History Review
#402
of 527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,761
of 381,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Law & History Review
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.