↓ Skip to main content

How do tumor cells respond to HDAC inhibition?

Overview of attention for article published in FEBS Journal, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do tumor cells respond to HDAC inhibition?
Published in
FEBS Journal, May 2016
DOI 10.1111/febs.13746
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Newbold, Katrina J. Falkenberg, H. Miles Prince, Ricky W. Johnstone

Abstract

It is now well recognised that mutations, de-regulated expression and aberrant recruitment of epigenetic readers, writers and erasers is a fundamentally important process in the onset and maintenance of many human tumors. The molecular, biological and biochemical characteristics of a particular class of epigenetic erasers, the histone deacetylases (HDACs), have been extensively studied and small molecule HDAC inhibitors (HDACi) have now been clinically approved for the treatment of human hemopoietic malignancies. This review explores our current understanding of the biological and molecular effects on tumor cells following HDACi-treatment. The predominant responses include induction of tumor cell death and inhibition of proliferation that in experimental models have been linked to therapeutic efficacy. However tumor cell-intrinsic responses to HDACi, including modulating tumor immunogenicity have also been described and may have substantial roles in mediating the anti-tumor effects of HDACi. We posit that the field has failed to fully reconcile the biological consequences of exposure to HDACis with the molecular events that underpin these responses, however progress is being made. Understanding the pleiotrophic activities of HDACis on tumor cells will hopefully fast track the development of more potent and selective HDACi that may be used alone or in combination to improve patient outcomes. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 101 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 24%
Chemistry 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 25 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2017.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from FEBS Journal
#9,484
of 12,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,898
of 319,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEBS Journal
#34
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.