You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A two‐phase sampling design for increasing detections of rare species in occupancy surveys
|
---|---|
Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2012.00201.x |
Authors |
Krishna Pacifici, Robert M. Dorazio, Michael J. Conroy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Germany | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 4% |
Colombia | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 2 | 1% |
Portugal | 2 | 1% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Nepal | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 3% |
Unknown | 121 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 41 | 28% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 12 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 8% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 61% |
Environmental Science | 34 | 24% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | <1% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | <1% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2016.
All research outputs
#6,875,368
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,952
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,797
of 174,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.