| Title |
Focus groups identify optimum urban nature in four Australian and New Zealand cities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Urban Ecosystems, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11252-019-00910-5 |
| Authors |
Lucy Taylor, Erin H. Leckey, Dieter F. Hochuli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
| Australia | 5 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Canada | 3 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 52% |
| Scientists | 11 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,121,301
of 24,291,750 outputs
Outputs from Urban Ecosystems
#47
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,925
of 363,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Ecosystems
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,291,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.