↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of GP and nurse practitioner consultations: an observational study.

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of GP and nurse practitioner consultations: an observational study.
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, December 2005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clive Seale, Elizabeth Anderson, Paul Kinnersley

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Professor 4 6%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 17 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 21%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 18 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,173,117
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#3,378
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,310
of 160,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.