You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Re-engineering justice? Robot judges, computerised courts and (semi) automated legal decision-making
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Legal Studies, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1017/lst.2019.5 |
| Authors |
John Morison, Adam Harkens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 21% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 76% |
| Scientists | 7 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 30% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2023.
All research outputs
#390,512
of 25,766,791 outputs
Outputs from Legal Studies
#1
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,905
of 363,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Legal Studies
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,766,791 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them