↓ Skip to main content

Isolation of Commensal Bacteria from Umbilical Cord Blood of Healthy Neonates Born by Cesarean Section

Overview of attention for article published in Current Microbiology, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,631)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
548 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
697 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Isolation of Commensal Bacteria from Umbilical Cord Blood of Healthy Neonates Born by Cesarean Section
Published in
Current Microbiology, September 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00284-005-0020-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Jiménez, Leonides Fernández, María L. Marín, Rocío Martín, Juan M. Odriozola, Carmen Nueno-Palop, Arjan Narbad, Mónica Olivares, Jordi Xaus, Juan M. Rodríguez

Abstract

In a previous study, lactic acid bacteria were isolated from meconium obtained from healthy neonates born by cesarean section. Such a finding suggested that term fetuses are not completely sterile, and that a mother-to-child efflux of commensal bacteria may exist. Therefore, presence of such bacteria in umbilical cord blood of healthy neonates born by elective cesarean section was investigated. The blood samples were submitted to an enrichment step and then inoculated onto agar plates. All the identified isolates belonged to the genus Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, or Propionibacterium. Later, a group of pregnant mice were orally inoculated with a genetically labeled E. faecium strain previously isolated from breast milk of a healthy woman. The labeled strain could be isolated and polymerase chain reaction detected from the amniotic fluid of the inoculated animals. In contrast, it could not be detected in the samples obtained from a noninoculated control group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 697 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 679 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 115 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 15%
Researcher 96 14%
Student > Master 96 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 47 7%
Other 88 13%
Unknown 150 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 111 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 103 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 72 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 3%
Other 68 10%
Unknown 176 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,036,419
of 24,953,268 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#9
of 2,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,316
of 65,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,953,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,631 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them