| Title |
In Vivo Validation of Electrocardiographic Imaging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, February 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.11.012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthijs J.M. Cluitmans, Pietro Bonizzi, Joël M.H. Karel, Marco Das, Bas L.J.H. Kietselaer, Monique M.J. de Jong, Frits W. Prinzen, Ralf L.M. Peeters, Ronald L. Westra, Paul G.A. Volders |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 29 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#14,280,554
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#1,201
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,696
of 424,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.