| Title |
Transpulmonary thermodilution before and during veno-venous extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation ECMO: an observational study on a potential loss of indicator into the extra-corporeal circuit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10877-019-00398-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alexander Herner, Tobias Lahmer, Ulrich Mayr, Sebastian Rasch, Jochen Schneider, Roland M. Schmid, Wolfgang Huber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 18% |
| Italy | 3 | 14% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 27% |
| Unknown | 4 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 58% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,571,873
of 23,738,567 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#45
of 750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,569
of 367,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,738,567 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.