| Title |
Development of a neural rosette formation assay (RoFA) to identify neurodevelopmental toxicants and to characterize their transcriptome disturbances
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-019-02612-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadine Dreser, Katrin Madjar, Anna-Katharina Holzer, Marion Kapitza, Christopher Scholz, Petra Kranaster, Simon Gutbier, Stefanie Klima, David Kolb, Christian Dietz, Timo Trefzer, Johannes Meisig, Christoph van Thriel, Margit Henry, Michael R. Berthold, Nils Blüthgen, Agapios Sachinidis, Jörg Rahnenführer, Jan G. Hengstler, Tanja Waldmann, Marcel Leist |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2019.
All research outputs
#15,586,847
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#2,024
of 2,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,615
of 360,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#18
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.