↓ Skip to main content

Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
56 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Outcomes at follow-up of negative colonoscopy in average risk population: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
British Medical Journal, November 2019
DOI 10.1136/bmj.l6109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 6%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2024.
All research outputs
#863,391
of 34,566,597 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#7,873
of 75,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,539
of 411,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#141
of 804 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,566,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 804 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.