| Title |
Imaging-Guided Therapies for Pericardial Diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.08.027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Chetrit, Bo Xu, Deborah H Kwon, Jay Ramchand, Rene E Rodriguez, Carmela D Tan, Christine L Jellis, Douglas R Johnston, Rahul D Renapurkar, Paul C Cremer, Allan L Klein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 19% |
| Spain | 10 | 7% |
| Argentina | 9 | 6% |
| Colombia | 8 | 5% |
| Mexico | 7 | 5% |
| Chile | 5 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Peru | 4 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 57 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 105 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 9% |
| Scientists | 11 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 54% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#493,860
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#98
of 2,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,745
of 378,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#6
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,734 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.