↓ Skip to main content

Donald Trump and Post-Pivot Asia: The Implications of a “Transactional” Approach to Foreign Policy

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies Review, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 579)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Donald Trump and Post-Pivot Asia: The Implications of a “Transactional” Approach to Foreign Policy
Published in
Asian Studies Review, November 2019
DOI 10.1080/10357823.2019.1680604
Authors

Mark Beeson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 23%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 41%
Arts and Humanities 4 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 16 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2021.
All research outputs
#760,191
of 25,218,929 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies Review
#9
of 579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,497
of 367,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies Review
#3
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,218,929 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.