| Title |
The role of the outer setting in implementation: associations between state demographic, fiscal, and policy factors and use of evidence-based treatments in mental healthcare
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-019-0944-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric J. Bruns, Elizabeth M. Parker, Spencer Hensley, Michael D. Pullmann, Philip H. Benjamin, Aaron R. Lyon, Kimberly E. Hoagwood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 48% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 24 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 19 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 18% |
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,204,266
of 24,593,959 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#208
of 1,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,335
of 365,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,593,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.