| Title |
Nrf2-mediated redox signaling in arsenic carcinogenesis: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00204-012-0920-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dona Sinha, Jaydip Biswas, Anupam Bishayee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 25% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 15% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2011.
All research outputs
#20,587,621
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#2,384
of 2,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,417
of 170,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.