| Title |
Misexpression of the Niemann-Pick disease type C1 (NPC1)-like protein in Arabidopsis causes sphingolipid accumulation and reproductive defects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Planta, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00425-015-2322-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maximilian J. Feldman, Brenton C. Poirier, B. Markus Lange |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 19% |
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 27% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#185,639
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from Planta
#1
of 2,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,051
of 267,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.