↓ Skip to main content

Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis: Physician and Patient/Parent Global Activity, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HA…

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Care & Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
319 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Measures of adult and juvenile dermatomyositis, polymyositis, and inclusion body myositis: Physician and Patient/Parent Global Activity, Manual Muscle Testing (MMT), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)/Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C‐HAQ), Childhood Myositis Assessment Scale (CMAS), Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT), Disease Activity Score (DAS), Short Form 36 (SF‐36), Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ), Physician Global Damage, Myositis Damage Index (MDI), Quantitative Muscle Testing (QMT), Myositis Functional Index‐2 (FI‐2), Myositis Activities Profile (MAP), Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale (IBMFRS), Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI), Cutaneous Assessment Tool (CAT), Dermatomyositis Skin Severity Index (DSSI), Skindex, and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Published in
Arthritis Care & Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/acr.20532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa G. Rider, Victoria P. Werth, Adam M. Huber, Helene Alexanderson, Anand Prahalad Rao, Nicolino Ruperto, Laura Herbelin, Richard Barohn, David Isenberg, Frederick W. Miller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 104 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 14 13%
Other 9 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 26 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 5%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 22 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#19,946,609
of 24,514,423 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Care & Research
#2,563
of 2,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,812
of 146,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Care & Research
#42
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,514,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.