↓ Skip to main content

生命力旺盛なクズと人間との関わり : アンケート調査の結果

Overview of attention for article published in Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1669 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
生命力旺盛なクズと人間との関わり : アンケート調査の結果
Published in
Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan, August 2002
DOI 10.24536/cssjchugoku.43.0_22
Authors

豊原 英子, 猪谷 富雄

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,669 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 239. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#160,185
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95
of 48,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Report of the Chugoku Branch of the Crop Science Society of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.5. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 48,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them