↓ Skip to main content

Balancing exploration and exploitation in listwise and pairwise online learning to rank for information retrieval

Overview of attention for article published in Information Retrieval Journal, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Balancing exploration and exploitation in listwise and pairwise online learning to rank for information retrieval
Published in
Information Retrieval Journal, April 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10791-012-9197-9
Authors

Katja Hofmann, Shimon Whiteson, Maarten de Rijke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 96 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 21%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 70 67%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,629,858
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Information Retrieval Journal
#53
of 190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,845
of 177,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Information Retrieval Journal
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 190 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.