↓ Skip to main content

Authors’ reply re: Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low‐risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission—a multicentre randomised trial…

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Authors’ reply re: Admission cardiotocography versus intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart in low‐risk pregnancy during evaluation for possible labour admission—a multicentre randomised trial: the ADCAR trial
Published in
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, November 2018
DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.15491
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie Smith, Cecily Begley, John Newell, Shane Higgins, Deirdre J Murphy, Martin J White, John J Morrison, Siobhan Canny, Donough O'Donovan, Declan Devane

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#8,152,094
of 25,870,940 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#3,237
of 6,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,030
of 366,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#52
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,940 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.