| Title |
Breakpoint beware: reliance on historical breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae leads to discrepancies in interpretation of susceptibility testing for carbapenems and cephalosporins and gaps in detection of carbapenem-resistant organisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10096-019-03711-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie L. Yarbrough, Meghan A. Wallace, Robert F. Potter, Alaric W. D’Souza, Gautam Dantas, Carey-Ann D. Burnham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 67% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 78% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,733,006
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#425
of 2,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,188
of 363,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,766 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.