↓ Skip to main content

ギャバ(GABA)の効能と有効摂取量に関する文献的考察

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society of Taste Technology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ギャバ(GABA)の効能と有効摂取量に関する文献的考察
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society of Taste Technology, March 2010
DOI 10.11274/bimi2002.2010.15_32
Authors

佐々木 泰弘, 河野 元信

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Chemistry 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Taste Technology
#7
of 7 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,364
of 102,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Taste Technology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them