↓ Skip to main content

Imaging of Carotid Dissection

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Imaging of Carotid Dissection
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11916-019-0741-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan Hakimi, Sanjeev Sivakumar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Other 7 12%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 42%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#20,588,763
of 23,173,635 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#739
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#371,604
of 438,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,173,635 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.