| Title |
New host range and distribution of Ceratocystis pirilliformis in South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-016-0933-7 |
| Authors |
D. H. Lee, J. Roux, B. D. Wingfield, I. Barnes, M. J. Wingfield |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 20% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#15,757,284
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#743
of 1,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,722
of 314,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,027 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.