↓ Skip to main content

Binary Neutron Star Mergers

Overview of attention for article published in Living Reviews in Relativity, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 143)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Binary Neutron Star Mergers
Published in
Living Reviews in Relativity, July 2012
DOI 10.12942/lrr-2012-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joshua A. Faber, Frederic A. Rasio

Abstract

We review the current status of studies of the coalescence of binary neutron star systems. We begin with a discussion of the formation channels of merging binaries and we discuss the most recent theoretical predictions for merger rates. Next, we turn to the quasi-equilibrium formalisms that are used to study binaries prior to the merger phase and to generate initial data for fully dynamical simulations. The quasi-equilibrium approximation has played a key role in developing our understanding of the physics of binary coalescence and, in particular, of the orbital instability processes that can drive binaries to merger at the end of their lifetimes. We then turn to the numerical techniques used in dynamical simulations, including relativistic formalisms, (magneto-)hydrodynamics, gravitational-wave extraction techniques, and nuclear microphysics treatments. This is followed by a summary of the simulations performed across the field to date, including the most recent results from both fully relativistic and microphysically detailed simulations. Finally, we discuss the likely directions for the field as we transition from the first to the second generation of gravitational-wave interferometers and while supercomputers reach the petascale frontier.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 6%
United States 6 6%
Germany 2 2%
Unknown 95 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 37%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 12 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 87 80%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 17 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,239,117
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from Living Reviews in Relativity
#49
of 143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,869
of 164,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Living Reviews in Relativity
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them