| Title |
Pliocene flora and paleoenvironment of Zanda Basin, Tibet, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Earth Sciences, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11430-019-9475-2 |
| Authors |
Jian Huang, Tao Su, Shufeng Li, Feixiang Wu, Tao Deng, Zhekun Zhou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#21,699,788
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#425
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,828
of 370,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.